3 Reasons Why OOH is the Most Effective Media Reaching Millennials & Gen Z
Or Is It? Challenging Outdoor Advertising
Why OOH Is Effective In Reaching Millennials And Gen Z
Nicholas Wooten, SVP Marketing & Innovation,
for Billups and Op-Ed Contributor, to Media Post.
Nicholas Wooten, is another of the many ‘Wonder Hires’ by Ben Billups and company. Not wonder, as in why or how Billups comes to hire so much top talent, but defined in marvel and admiration of the personnel he manages to attract. Wooten is a true thought leader and brilliant in his work. A ‘Wonder Boy’ if you will.
Wooten drafted a well conceived post appearing in Media Post’s feature ‘Agency Daily’.
The commentary is titled, ‘Why OOH is Effective in Reaching Millennials and Gen Z’.
Wooten cites cord-cutting, ad-blocking and radio-streaming as primary issues reaching or failing to reach, the Millennial and Gen Z audience. With emphasis on ad blocking, he states, “The shift in audience consumption habits has led to more investment in out-of-home (OOH) marketing. Outdoor ads have a steadfast, evergreen quality that appeals to most younger consumers and in contrast to other media channels, cannot be overlooked by skipping, fast-forwarding or paying more to avoid ads.”
Wooten lists 3 reasons why OOH is the most effective media for reaching Millennials & Gen Z:
1. Authentic and real-world experience resonates.
2. Shorter attention spans in a digitally saturated world.
3. OOH Provides A Last-Touch Opportunity.
Wottten shares, “consumers spend more than 70% of their time outside, while having less tolerance for digital and mobile ads than ever before.” He concludes, “… reaching Millenials and Gen Z with traditional TV, radio, and digital is becoming increasingly less effective, focus to real-world formats including OOH, will see better ROI for their marketing spend.”
That’s the brief summary of his Agency Daily post.
Here is the link we recommend reading⇒ ‘Why OOH is Effective in Reaching Millennials and Gen Z’.
Papazian comments to Wooten’s post:
Strong points by both Papazian and Wooten.
While OOH studies verify many of the points Wooten makes, Papazian’s challenging Outdoor Advertising to comparatively verify ad recall, message registration and purchase intent against TV is a fair one. It is a call out to the OOH Industry for a solution which should be considered, if indeed, it has not already been done. Anyone have it? If not, it’s worthy of consideration.
Read the Wooten post. Check out the comments which follow. Share your comments.